Forum Replies Created

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • in reply to: Feature wish list #100971

    Ben
    Participant

    Hi Oliver,
    a nice new feature for the ARS would be to include a catchment or catchments boundaries to the projection. The catchment(s) outlet should be defined by a user with a gesture.
    As a next step and based on this catchment I could imagine to present hydrographs for these catchment outlets. Maybe these hydrographs in combination with the precipitation could be presented at a different screen. So this would be a more hydrological ARS and based on this it would be possible to present the catchment characteristic in general or to show differences in catchments (small vs. large, flat vs. steep, round vs. stretched,…).

    Regards
    Benjamin

    in reply to: Sandbox design #100676

    Ben
    Participant

    For those who are interested in the gap design, here is the answer from Allyson: When I asked our technical director about the sand he said the gap is not as effective as it was intended to be. As with most all sand exhibits, the sand gets under visitor’s fingernails and sticks to their hands. Consequently, the sand is transferred to other exhibits throughout the museum.

    in reply to: Sandbox design #100675

    Ben
    Participant

    Oliver, thank you very much for the answer and the tip for the ARS in Berlin. I did not know that we have already one in Berlin or Germany. Regarding the orientation, we think we will stick to landscape orientation.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)